SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA FULL
SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA PLUS
SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA DOWNLOAD

Intel i7 12700K P-Cores 5Ghz / Intel i3 7100U Not sure if they do this at the edge, or in the cable modem, but it is damned dishonest.įinally, I see that Dutch hardware websites also rely on nPerf instead of : The testing phase lasts far longer than my normal burst time, so it's obvious that they have built in exceptions for the nodes. You'll get that burst, then it tail drops or something and really fucks up TCP connections for a minute.īack to the issue. I would rather have my 30 back, as something about their algorithms messes with connections past the burst. Don't sell a 30 Mbit circuit as 60 when all you can sustain is 30. To me this is just dishonesty on their part. In effect, what they have going is a burst rate, like old Frame Relay circuits. After the 'upgrade', any transfers start out in the 60Mbit range, and over the course of about 15-20 seconds, tapers off to about 30, many times much less. Previously, I could peg out my home connection at 30Mbit.

I have a 100 Mbit/sec connection at work, that I run. nPerf might be more reliable than speedtest

SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA DOWNLOAD

How can the download speed drop like this, even lower than the upload speed?Ī. Consulter le sujet - Fiabilité des test de vitesses de download/upload ?.

SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA PLUS

Plus you don't automatically have the same server twice in a row. At a server is automatically chosen, but beyond distance (based on geo-IP :X ) is not looked at. The speed test that you can do on your ISP's server is often not reliable, because it always gives perfect scores on their own servers.Ģ. Now we probably all know (from Ookla), but I regularly hear that the values you get from them are very questionable and do not give a good idea of the real speed you get from your ISP. I did a speetest on on several different servers I am at 60 constant (apart from a few months or even a week ago I was at 120)ġ.

SPEEDTEST NET OOKLA FULL

iperf and mikrotik get very close to full speed. never gets more that 100Mbps international. Then you also have this topic for example: There are other topics that also report that there may be a difference between the two websites: Translation: For 3 months, I have been on fiber (see my signature), I have a symmetrical Orange 400Mb/s package (down and up) with Nperf, I always have around 400 in both directions and even sometimes a little more!, but with Speedtest I never exceeded 300, often even below 200! measurements taken at the same time! I even had very low values below 10 when it was wrong. Original French text: Depuis 3 mois, je suis fibré (voir ma signature), j'ai un forfait Orange 400Mb/s symétrique (en down et up ) avec Nperf, j'ai toujours autour de 400 dans les 2 sens et même des fois un peu plus!, mais avec Speedtest je n'ai jamais dépassé 300, souvent même en dessous de 200 ! mesures faites au mêmes instants ! j'ai même eu des valeurs très faibles inférieures a 10 alors que c'était faux. Ookla's Speedtest is less qualitative for me and the upload is often blocked for me. nPerf uses multiple simultaneous connections for its test. Translation: Our reference site is nPerf, and I advise to always use the same server (manual choice) Wingo in Switzerland 100Gbs. Speedtest d'Ookla est pour moi moins qualitatif et souvent l'upload est bloqué chez moi. nPerf utilise plusieurs connexions simultanées pour son test. Original French text: Notre site de référence est nPerf, et je conseille d'utiliser toujours le même serveur (choix manuel) Wingo en Suisse 100Gbs.

Speedtest net ookla